About FluidStack
FluidStack Pricing
Key Features
Distributed GPU Network
Access GPUs from multiple data centers worldwide for better availability and pricing
API-First Platform
Full REST API for programmatic instance management and automation
Flexible Instance Types
Choose from on-demand, spot, and reserved instances based on your needs
Pre-configured Images
Ready-to-use images with PyTorch, TensorFlow, and other ML frameworks
Multi-GPU Support
Scale up to multi-GPU configurations for distributed training
Persistent Storage
Attach persistent volumes to preserve data across sessions
Best Use Cases
- ✓LLM Fine-Tuning - Affordable H100 and A100 instances for model customization
- ✓Image Generation - RTX 4090 instances for Stable Diffusion and similar models
- ✓ML Training - Cost-effective GPU clusters for research and development
- ✓Inference Workloads - Deploy models at scale with competitive pricing
- ✓Batch Processing - Process large datasets with on-demand GPU power
- ✓Prototyping - Spin up instances quickly for experimentation
Compare Providers
| Provider | Price (A100) | GPUs | Regions | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RunPod | $2.75/hr (A100) | 200+ | 31 | Reliability and community |
| Vast.ai | $2.20/hr (A100) | 500+ | 40+ | Lowest prices |
| Lambda Labs | $2.89/hr (A100) | 17+ | 3 | ML-optimized stack |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FluidStack reliable for production workloads?
FluidStack is suitable for training and batch workloads. For mission-critical production inference, consider providers with SLA guarantees like CoreWeave or Lambda Labs.
How does FluidStack pricing compare to AWS?
FluidStack is typically 40-60% cheaper than AWS EC2 GPU instances. The savings come from their distributed model and lower overhead.